Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Octogenarian and Nonagenarian Melanoma Patients.

Data regarding elderly melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 antibodies are in favor of tolerability outcomes that are similar to those of younger counterparts. However, there are very few studies focusing on elderly patients receiving nivolumab combined with ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI). Here, we ask what are the current prescribing patterns of NIVO + IPI in the very elderly population and analyze the tolerance profile. This French multicenter retrospective study was conducted on 60 melanoma patients aged 80 years and older treated with NIVO + IPI between January 2011 and June 2022. The mean age at first NIVO + IPI administration was 83.7 years (range: 79.3-93.3 years). Fifty-five patients (92%) were in good general condition and lived at home. Two dosing regimens were used: NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W (NIVO1 + IPI3) in 27 patients (45%) and NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W (NIVO3 + IPI1) in 33 patients (55%). NIVO + IPI was a first-line treatment in 39 patients (65%). The global prevalence of immune-related adverse events was 63% (38/60), with 27% (16/60) being of grade 3 or higher. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were less frequent in patients treated with NIVO3 + IPI1 compared with those treated with NIVO1 + IPI3 (12% versus 44%, p = 0.04). In conclusion, the prescribing patterns of NIVO + IPI in very elderly patients are heterogeneous in terms of the dosing regimen and line of treatment. The safety profile of NIVO + IPI is reassuring; whether or not the low-dose regimen NIVO3 + IPI1 should be preferred over NIVO1 + IPI3 in patients aged 80 years or older remains an open question.

Allogeneic transplantation in advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CUTALLO): a propensity score matched controlled prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are rare, usually refractory, and fatal diseases. Case series have suggested that allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) might improve the prognosis of advanced-stage CTCLs. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of allogeneic HSCT compared with non-HSCT therapy on the outcome of individuals with advanced-stage CTCLs. METHODS: In this prospective, multicentre, matched controlled trial, conducted at 30 hospitals, participants with advanced CTCLs were allocated treatment: if they had an available compatible related donor they were assigned to allogeneic HSCT, or if not they were allocated to non-allogeneic HSCT therapy. Key inclusion criteria were participants aged 18-70 years, with advanced stage mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome, and at least one poor prognostic criteria. Participants were excluded if they were not in complete or partial remission of the disease. Propensity score 1:1 matching with replacement (ie, that each participant treated with HSCT was matched to the participant with the closest propensity score treated with non-HSCT therapy, even if they had already been matched) was used to handle confounding factors, with the balance of covariate distribution between HSCT and non-HSCT groups assessed using standardised mean differences. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the matched intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02520908), and is currently active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: From June 1, 2016, to March 3, 2022, total of 99 participants were enrolled at 17 centres in France. Participants with a sibling or matched unrelated donor were assigned to allogeneic HSCT (HSCT group, n=55 [56%]) and participants without a donor were assigned to non-allogeneic HSCT treatment (non-HSCT group, n=44 [44%]). The median follow-up among survivors was 12·6 months (IQR 11·0-35·2). In the HSCT group, 51 participants (93%) were 1:1 matched to participants from the non-HSCT group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the HSCT group (9·0 months [95% CI 6·6-30·5]) than in the non-HSCT group (3·0 months [2·0-6·3]), with a hazard ratio of 0·38 (95% CI 0·21-0·69; p<0·0001). In the per-protocol population, 40 participants (78%) in the HSCT group had 101 serious events and 29 participants (67%) in the non-HSCT group had 70 serious adverse events. The most common serious adverse event other than graft-versus-host disease in both groups was infections, occurring in 30 participants (59%) in the HSCT group and in 19 participants (44%) in the non-HSCT group. INTERPRETATION: Allogeneic HSCT was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival in participants with advanced-stage CTCLs. These results indicate that allogeneic HSCT treatment should be made available to individuals with high-risk, advanced-stage mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome who achieve pre-transplant disease remission. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health, National Cancer Institute, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique en Cancérologie.

Efficacy of Large Use of Combined Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in a Cohort of Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy-Treated Melanoma Patients.

To assess the role of radiotherapy in anti-PD-1-treated melanoma patients, we studied retrospectively a cohort of 206 consecutive anti-PD-1 monotherapy-treated advanced melanoma patients (59% M1c/d, 50% ≥ 3 metastasis sites, 33% ECOG PS ≥ 1, 33% > 1st line, 32% elevated serum LDH) having widely (49%) received concurrent radiotherapy, with RECIST 1.1 evaluation of radiated and non-radiated lesions. Overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survivals were calculated using Kaplan−Meier. Radiotherapy was performed early (39 patients) or after 3 months (61 patients with confirmed anti-PD-1 failure). The first radiotherapy was hypofractionated extracranial radiotherapy to 1−2 targets (26 Gy-4 weekly sessions, 68 patients), intracranial radiosurgery (25 patients), or palliative. Globally, 67 (32.5% [95% CI: 26.1−38.9]) patients achieved complete response (CR), with 25 CR patients having been radiated. In patients failing anti-PD-1, PFS and OS from anti-PD-1 initiation were 16.8 [13.4−26.6] and 37.0 months [24.6−NA], respectively, in radiated patients, and 2.2 [1.5−2.6] and 4.3 months [2.6−7.1], respectively, in non-radiated patients (p < 0.001). Abscopal response was observed in 31.5% of evaluable patients who radiated late. No factors associated with response in radiated patients were found. No unusual adverse event was seen. High-dose radiotherapy may enhance CR rate above the 6−25% reported in anti-PD-1 monotherapy or ipilimumab + nivolumab combo studies in melanoma patients.

Impact of prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors on dacarbazine efficacy in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite its low efficacy, chemotherapy with dacarbazine remains an option in metastatic melanoma patients after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) ± targeted therapy. Some observations suggested an increased efficacy of chemotherapy in melanoma or lung cancer patients previously treated with ICI; we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dacarbazine in a controlled-group study of patients pre-treated or not with ICI. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from all consecutive patients treated with dacarbazine for advanced cutaneous melanoma without brain metastasis, in our skin cancer centre between June 2006 and September 2019. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety of dacarbazine. RESULTS: Among 72 patients, 17 (23.6%) received dacarbazine after ICI and 55 (76.3%) without prior ICI. Despite less favourable prognostic factors in patients ICI-pre-treated, median PFS was 4.27 months (range 0.89-43.69) in this group versus 2.04 months (range 1.25-39.25) P = 0.03 in non-ICI-pre-treated patients; ORR were 35.3% and 12.7%, respectively. The median OS and the occurrence of adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Dacarbazine seems to offer a short-lived benefit in patients with progressive advanced disease despite ICI (±targeted therapy), and could be an alternative before considering best supportive care.

Treatment strategies and safety of rechallenge in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitors-related myositis: a national multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: The occurrence of immune-related myositis (irM) is increasing, yet there are no therapeutic guidelines. We sought to analyse the current therapeutic strategies of irM and evaluate the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) rechallenge. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide retrospective study between April 2018 and March 2020 including irM without myocardial involvement. Depending on the presence of cutaneous signs or unusual histopathological features, patients were classified into two groups: typical or atypical irM. Therapeutic strategies were analysed in both groups. The modalities and outcomes of ICI rechallenge were reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 20 patients, 16 presented typical irM. Regardless of severity, most typical irM were treated with steroid monotherapy (n = 14/16) and all had a complete response within ≤3 weeks. The efficacy of oral steroids for non-severe typical irM (n = 10) was the same with low-dose (≤0.5 mg/kg/day) or high-dose (1 mg/kg/day). Severe typical irM were successfully treated with intravenous methylprednisolone. Atypical irM (n = 4) had a less favourable evolution, including one irM-related death, and required heavy immunosuppression. ICIs were safely reintroduced in nine patients presenting a moderate (n = 6) or a severe (n = 3) irM. CONCLUSION: Our data highlight that steroid monotherapy is an effective treatment for typical irM, either with prednisone or with intravenous methylprednisone pulses depending on the severity. The identification of unusual features is important in determining the initial therapeutic strategy. The outcomes of rechallenged patients are in favour of a safe reintroduction of ICI following symptom resolution and creatin kinase (CK) normalization in moderate and severe forms of irM.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A New Adverse Effect of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, 11 Cases.

This study aims at reporting 11 cases of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) occurring in patients on immunotherapy. The increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncodermatology is associated with the appearance of immunologic adverse effects linked to nonspecific stimulation of the immune system. CTS has not been reported in this context. A retrospective multicenter review was performed on CTSs occurring on immunotherapy and confirmed with electroneuromyography. Data were collated from patients' files. Most of the time, CTS was severe, bilateral, with a motor deficit and confirmed axonal damage on electroneuromyography. In 4 cases, it was associated with rheumatological adverse effects (arthralgia/inflammatory synovitis). The most effective treatment appeared to be general corticosteroid therapy, even at low doses (<15 mg/d), or surgery. An imputability of the CTS of these patients to immunotherapy was considered due to the unusual intensity of the symptoms and the absence of other predisposing factors (diabetes and dysthyroidism well-controlled). Its combination with other immunologic adverse effects and the efficacy of general corticosteroid therapy suggests an immunologic origin. CTS is probably an immunologic adverse effect of immunotherapy. It is often severe or misleading in presentation and affects quality of life. The recognition of this adverse effect should make it possible to provide patients with appropriate care.

Efficacy of late concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy in advanced melanoma patients failing anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

Advanced melanoma patients who failed anti-PD-1 therapy have limited options. We analyzed a cohort of 133 advanced melanoma patients receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy in a referral center between April 2015 and December 2017, and included the 26 patients with confirmed progressive (PD) or stable disease who received additional radiotherapy with an unmodified anti-PD-1 mAb regimen. Tumor evaluations were done on radiated and nonradiated (RECIST 1.1) lesions, with abscopal effect defined as a partial (PR) or complete response (CR) outside radiated fields. Primary endpoint was the CR + PR rate in radiated + nonradiated lesions. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS) and safety. First late radiotherapy, consisting of hypofractionated radiotherapy (3-5 sessions, 20-26 Gy), standard palliative radiotherapy or brain radiosurgery was begun after a median of 6.3 months of anti-PD-1 in 23, 2 and 1 patient(s), respectively. Best response was 8 (31%) CR, 2 (8%) profound PR allowing surgical resection of remaining metastases and 16 (62%) PD. Abscopal effect was seen in 35% of patients. Median PFS and MSS since anti-PD-1 initiation was 15.2 [95% CI: 8.0 not achieved (na)] and 35.3 [95% CI: 18.5 na] months, respectively. PFS curves seemed to achieve a plateau. We discontinued anti-PD-1 therapy in 9/10 of patients with no residual evaluable disease and observed one relapse after a median of 10 months off anti-PD1-therapy. No unusual adverse event was recorded. Limitations of the study include its retrospective nature and limited size. Hypofractionated radiotherapy may enhance anti-PD1 monotherapy efficacy in patients who previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy. Controlled studies are needed.

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Anti-TNFα Treatment of Severe Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-induced Colitis in Advanced Melanoma: The Mecolit Survey.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) significantly improve overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced melanoma, but immune-related colitis may occur and warrant anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) treatment in severe forms. A nationwide, multicenter retrospective survey was conducted to assess both, the real-life incidence of grade 3/4 ICI-induced colitis treated with anti-TNFα, in patients with advanced melanoma, and the consequence of this therapeutic strategy on disease outcome. All patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-TNFα agents for severe ICI-related colitis in the participating centers were included. Relative incidence was calculated according to the total number of patients treated with ICI in network centers during the period of inclusion. The possible impact of anti-TNFα treatment on disease outcome was evaluated through comparison of objective response rate, progression-free survival, and OS with pivotal literature data. Twenty-seven patients from 13 tertiary referral centers were included. Overall, severe ICI-related colitis treated with anti-TNFα occurred in 1% of patients with advanced melanoma, mostly with ipilimumab. Infliximab was successfully used in all patients but 1, mostly after 1 infusion. OS and progression-free survival of 12 and 3 months, respectively, were observed in these patients, along with an objective response rate of 41% at 12 months. This survey shows a low real-life incidence of severe colitis requiring anti-TNFα. Response rates to immunotherapy and survival data do not appear to significantly differ from those observed in pivotal studies. Severe ICI-induced colitis requiring anti-TNFα treatment appears to be a rare event in advanced melanoma, and infliximab does not seem to adversely affect disease outcome.

Hyponatremia and MAP-kinase inhibitors in malignant melanoma: Frequency, pathophysiological aspects and clinical consequences.

The incidence of malignant melanoma has increased over the past two decades. A combined BRAF/MEK inhibitor regimen has been shown to lead to prolonged survival and progression-free survival in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. Different nephrotoxic effects have been described, among them hyponatremia. The goal of the present narrative review was to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms driving hyponatremia when using selective BRAF inhibitors and/or MEK inhibitors in order to propose potential strategies to prevent or to treat this side effect. Several mechanisms of kidney injury have been suggested including changes in glomerular and tubular function. However, the precise mechanisms of hyponatremia remain unknown. Our hypothesis is that BRAF/MEK inhibitors lead to hyponatremia and water retention (so-called dilution hyponatremia) by activating aquaporin 2 (AQP2) trafficking from its intracellular compartment to the luminal cell membrane, and by activating ENaC channel. Therefore, we recommend treating the hyponatremia related to BRAF/MEK inhibitors with restriction of fluid intake.

Pembrolizumab and concurrent hypo-fractionated radiotherapy for advanced non-resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most frequent non-melanoma skin cancer. Treatment options for inoperable advanced cSCC cases are limited. The efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies (mAb) has been reported recently in some patients with cSCC. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of anti-PD-1 mAb in a case series of inoperable advanced cSCC and to analyse the efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the files of all patients with advanced inoperable cSCC treated with anti-PD-1 mAb and concurrent radiotherapy outside clinical trials in our skin cancer centre before December 31, 2017. RESULTS: A total of four patients with locally or regionally advanced cSCC were identified. All patients received pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg every three weeks and concurrent radiotherapy. Two patients who received pembrolizumab as first-line therapy with concurrent radiotherapy (one with skull and leptomeningeal invasion and one with rapidly progressing regional cSCC) had a complete response, allowing treatment discontinuation, without recurrence after a median of 11 months off treatment. All other patients experienced progressive disease. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 14.4 and 15.6 months, respectively. No toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: There appears to be a place for pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for unresectable or advanced cSCC. Further studies are needed to evaluate concomitant radiotherapy with anti-PD1 antibodies.

Efficacy of combined hypo-fractionated radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 monotherapy in difficult-to-treat advanced melanoma patients.

Information on the role of radiotherapy in anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody-treated melanoma patients is limited. We report on a prospective cohort of advanced melanoma patients treated simultaneously with radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 therapy between 01/01/15 and 30/06/16. Tumor evaluations (RECIST 1.1) were performed every 3 months on radiated and non-radiated lesions. Twenty-five advanced melanoma patients (64% AJCC stage IV M1c, 64% on second-line treatment or more, 60% with elevated LDH serum levels) were included. Radiotherapy was performed early (median: 24 days) after the first anti-PD-1 dose in 15 patients with rapidly progressing symptomatic lesion(s) or later (median: 5.4 months) in 10 patients with progressive disease (PD) despite PD-1 blockade. Radiotherapy was limited to one organ in 24 patients and consisted mainly of hypo-fractioned radiotherapy (median dose 26 Gy in 3-5 fractions, 17 patients) or brain radiosurgery (5 patients). Median follow-up after first anti-PD-1 dose was 16.9 m (range 2.7-27.4), with 44% of patients alive at last follow-up. For radiated lesions, rates of complete (CR), partial (PR) responses, stable disease (SD) or PD were 24%, 12%, 24%, and 32%, respectively. For non-radiated lesions, rates of CR, PR, SD, and PD were 20%, 19%, 12%, and 40%, respectively. Responses achieved after radiotherapy for radiated and non-radiated areas were correlated (Pearson correlation r: 0.89, P<0.0001) suggesting an abscopal effect. Five patients with CR remained disease-free after discontinuation of anti-PD-1 for a median of 9.5 months. No unusual adverse event was recorded. Hypo-fractionated radiotherapy may enhance efficacy of anti-PD1 therapy in difficult-to-treat patients. Controlled studies are needed.

Increase in NRAS mutant allele percentage during metastatic melanoma progression.

One-fifth of cutaneous melanomas have dominant gain-of-function mutations of the NRAS oncogene. We report the first two cases of increasing NRAS mutant allele frequency in melanoma metastases and show that the chromosomal mechanism of this homozygosity is an increased polysomy of chromosome 1. We observed an increase in NRAS mutant allele percentage (NRAS-MA%) in the metastatic melanoma progression from 2 patients with melanomas harbouring a NRAS mutation (p.Q61K in case 1 and p.Q61R in case 2). In case 1, we observed a NRAS-MA% increase from 18% within the first metastatic node to 81%, 92% and 85% respectively in the three subsequent metastases: lymph node, brain and subcutaneous metastases biopsied 1, 6 and 17 months, respectively, after the initial lymph node biopsy. In case 2, we observed an increase in NRAS-MA% from 40% within the primary melanoma to 63% within the metastatic lymph node. FISH analysis showed the same results in both cases: a frequent polysomy of chromosome 1 in metastasis samples with NRAS mutant allele percentage >60%, while most cells were disomic in the samples with well-balanced heterozygous mutations. The percentage of NRAS mutant allele may increase during metastatic progression and may be associated with chromosomal instability. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic impact of the NRAS homozygous status and/or polyploidy in metastatic cutaneous melanomas.

Relapsing pneumonitis due to two distinct inhibitors of the MAPK/ERK pathway: report of a case.

BACKGROUND: BRAF and MEK are component of the MAPK/ERK pathway and inhibitors of these proteins have significantly improved the outcome of metastatic melanoma. We report for the first time two sequential episodes of pneumonitis presumably induced by trametinib (a MEK inhibitor) and vemurafenib (a BRAF inhibitor) in a 50 year-old man. CASE PRESENTATION: While receiving trametinib for a metastatic melanoma, the patient developed non-febrile acute respiratory failure in the context of bilateral ground-glass opacities and sub pleural reticulations on high resolution computed tomography. An excess of lymphocytes was found in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Outcome was favorable after simple drug discontinuation. He subsequently developed a similar clinical-imaging picture 6 months into vemurafenib. A transthoracic lung biopsy disclosed interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate, poorly-formed granulomas with multinucleated giant cells and scattered eosinophils. Outcome was again favorable after simple drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: These two episodes in the same patient suggest that MAPK/ERK inhibitors may cause interstitial lung disease and may exert cross toxicity. This side effect is of particular interest for physicians in charge of patients with melanoma but this drug family is currently under development for several other solid tumors.

A caveolin-dependent and PI3K/AKT-independent role of PTEN in ß-catenin transcriptional activity.

Loss of the tumour suppressor PTEN is frequent in human melanoma, results in MAPK activation, suppresses senescence and mediates metastatic behaviour. How PTEN loss mediates these effects is unknown. Here we show that loss of PTEN in epithelial and melanocytic cell lines induces the nuclear localization and transcriptional activation of ß-catenin independent of the PI3K-AKT-GSK3ß axis. The absence of PTEN leads to caveolin-1 (CAV1)-dependent ß-catenin transcriptional modulation in vitro, cooperates with NRAS(Q61K) to initiate melanomagenesis in vivo and induces efficient metastasis formation associated with E-cadherin internalization. The CAV1-ß-catenin axis is mediated by a feedback loop in which ß-catenin represses transcription of miR-199a-5p and miR-203, which suppress the levels of CAV1 mRNA in melanoma cells. These data reveal a mechanism by which loss of PTEN increases CAV1-mediated dissociation of ß-catenin from membranous E-cadherin, which may promote senescence bypass and metastasis.

Uveitis in patients with late-stage cutaneous melanoma treated with vemurafenib.

IMPORTANCE: This case series highlights the risk of uveitis in patients treated with vemurafenib for unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma. OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence and severity of uveitis as an adverse effect of vemurafenib therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: In this observational small case series, data were collected successively from May 1, 2012, through February 31, 2013, from patients with clinical signs of ocular inflammation treated with vemurafenib at the Department of Ophthalmology, Cochin-Hôtel-Dieu Hospital. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patients' demographics, vemurafenib dosages, and the intervals between the onset of treatment and the first ocular symptoms were recorded. The characteristics of ocular inflammatory manifestations were analyzed. The effect of the discontinuation of vemurafenib therapy on ocular manifestations was assessed, as well as the effect of rechallenging when vemurafenib was reintroduced. RESULTS: Seven patients (mean [SD] age, 74.7 [4.0] years) had uveitis. The vemurafenib dose was 960 mg twice per day in 6 patients and a half dose in 1 patient. The mean (SD) time until the appearance of ocular signs was 5.6 (2.3) months (range, 19 days to 7 months), and inflammation ranged from mild or low-grade anterior uveitis to severe explosive panuveitis complicated by retinal detachment. Signs of ocular inflammation were always bilateral. Optical coherence tomography revealed a macular edema in only 1 of the 7 patients. Clinical improvement occurred when vemurafenib therapy was stopped in 5 of 7 patients. The rechallenge at treatment reintroduction was positive in 2 of 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This small case series highlights that uveitis can be a noteworthy adverse effect of vemurafenib therapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma. However, these cases of uveitis were usually restricted to the anterior segment and manageable with local corticosteroid therapy, which justified the continuation of vemurafenib therapy because the benefits regarding the patients' survival were greater than the risk to their vision.

Prognostic value of BRAF(V6°°) mutations in melanoma patients after resection of metastatic lymph nodes.

PURPOSE: BRAF (V600) mutations are frequent in melanomas, and BRAF(V600)-targeted therapy have dramatic, but often transitory, efficacy in stage IV patients. Prognosis of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III melanoma is heterogeneous. We aimed to determine the overall survival (OS) of stage III patients with a nodal deposit of ≥2 mm according to BRAF (V600) mutations and other previously reported prognostic criteria. METHODS: This retrospective study included 105 consecutive patients with stage III cutaneous melanomas. Most patients underwent a prospective follow-up. BRAF (V600) mutations were detected by sequencing and pyrosequencing of DNA in samples containing >60 % melanoma cells. RESULTS: BRAF mutations (p.V600E and p.V600K in 83 and 14 % of cases, respectively) were detected in 40 % of the patients. For patients with and without BRAF mutations, death occurred in 83.3 and 60.3 %, with a median OS of 1.4 and 2.8 years, respectively. Patient age, primary melanoma ulceration, number of invaded lymph nodes, AJCC staging at study entry, and BRAF status were linked to OS in the univariate analysis. The only characteristics associated with OS in the multivariate analysis were number of invaded lymph nodes (P = 0.005, hazard ratio 2.2, 95 % confidence interval 1.3-3.9) and BRAF status (P = 0.005, hazard ratio 1.9, 95 % confidence interval 1.2-3.1). CONCLUSIONS: BRAF (V600) status could be used to stage melanoma patients with nodal deposits. Our results may also help to plan adjuvant trials in these patients, for whom the low tumor load may induce longer efficacy of BRAF-targeted therapies.

The contribution of high-resolution ultrasonography in preoperatively detecting sentinel-node metastases in melanoma patients.

To evaluate the ability of high-resolution ultrasonography (hrUS) to detect sentinel-node (SN) melanoma metastases preoperatively before sentinel-node biopsy (SNB), to define hrUS resolution, and to evaluate which US criteria should be used. During a 6.5-year period, 131 consecutive patients with 132 >or=1-mm thick or ulcerated cutaneous melanomas, who were followed up at a single center, were enrolled. All patients underwent preoperative regional lymph-node hrUS and SNB. We used the recently evaluated ultrasonographic stringent and nonstringent hrUS criteria to detect SN metastases. Sizes of the SN metastatic deposits were measured under light microscopy. Thirty-five (27%) patients had a positive SNB. HrUS identified only three positive SNs as being metastatic. Sensitivity and specificity using stringent criteria were 8.8% [95% confidence interval (CI, 2.3-24.8%) and 95.9% (95% CI, 89.3-98.7%)], respectively. Positive-predictive value was 42.9% (95% CI, 11.9-79.9%). The nonstringent criteria provided four additional true-positive results, but lowered specificity (89.8%; 95% CI, 81.6-94.7%) with no significant improvement in sensitivity (20.6%; 95% CI, 9.3-38.4%). Positive-predictive value using nonstringent criteria was 41.2% (95% CI, 19.3-66.4%). HrUS failed to detect all metastatic deposits <5 mm in diameter. HrUS assessment of early-stage melanomas cannot replace surgical SNB. Owing to its low positive-predictive value, hrUS was unable to identify patients who would have to proceed directly to completion lymphadenectomy.